IRVINE, Calif., Feb. 20, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — In today’s post 911 world, the value of privacy is at an all-time high. Many U.S. taxpayers simply do not realize how exposed their financial information already may be, both to third parties and the federal government. Based on statements made recently by IRS officials, any unwanted financial transparency is likely to increase over time.

Most recently, the Treasury Department has announced revisions to its plan to implement specific reporting requirements against domestic banks and offshore banks that have U.S. taxpayer clients. These proposals have been strictly scrutinized by the domestic and international banking communities and conservative legislators, but the IRS is making no secret that it plans to use the new measures as soon as they are available. This would lead to more civil tax audits and criminal tax prosecutions, which should alarm all taxpayers, not just those at the top of the earning chain.

You may be able to act now to reduce the chances of a costly government audit or criminal tax investigations. The first step in that process is scheduling a consultation with the Tax Law Offices of David W. Klasing. Our dual-licensed Tax Lawyers and CPAs can assess your tax reporting history, no matter how complicated, and help you guarantee a pass on criminal tax prosecution in the right circumstances. Call today at (888) 904-4096 or schedule online here to book a reduced rate initial consultation.

What is really scarry here is all the IRS must do is add up all deposits to all bank accounts you control, eliminate interbank transfers and compare that to the income you have reported in a particular calendar year and that might be all she wrote.  All it takes is $10,000 of unreported income to invite a criminal tax inquiry.  Hopefully they are sophisticated enough to eliminate nontaxable sources of deposits like loans or gifts, but I would not count on it. 

If you have failed to file a tax return for one or more years or have taken a position on a tax return that could not be supported upon an IRS or state tax authority audit, eggshell audit, reverse eggshell audit, or criminal tax investigation, it is in your best interest to contact an experienced tax defense attorney to determine your best route back into federal or state tax compliance without facing criminal prosecution.

Note:  As long as a taxpayer that has willfully committed tax crimes (potentially including non-filed foreign information returns coupled with affirmative evasion of U.S. income tax on offshore income) self-reports the tax fraud (including a pattern of non-filed returns) through a domestic or offshore voluntary disclosure before the IRS has started an audit or criminal tax investigation / prosecution, the taxpayer can ordinarily be successfully brought back into tax compliance and receive a nearly guaranteed pass on criminal tax prosecution and simultaneously often receive a break on the civil penalties that would otherwise apply. 

It is imperative that you hire an experienced and reputable criminal tax defense attorney to take you through the voluntary disclosure process.  Only an Attorney has the Attorney Client Privilege and Work Product Privileges that will prevent the very professional that you hire from being potentially being forced to become a witness against you, especially where they prepared the returns that need to be amended, in a subsequent criminal tax audit, investigation or prosecution.

Moreover, only an Attorney can enter you into a voluntary disclosure without engaging in the unauthorized practice of law (a crime in itself). Only an Attorney trained in Criminal Tax Defense fully understands the risks and rewards involved in voluntary disclosures and how to protect you if you do not qualify for a voluntary disclosure.

As uniquely qualified and extensively experienced Criminal Tax Defense Tax Attorneys, Kovel CPAs and EAs, our firm provides a one stop shop to efficiently achieve the optimal and predictable results that simultaneously protect your liberty and your net worth.   See our Testimonials to see what our clients have to say about us!

Treasury Department Amends Initial Proposal for Bank Reporting Requirements

The U.S. government is making changes to an original plan that would heighten reporting requirements for U.S. banks. The initial plan, proposed in May of 2021, would require banks with U.S. account holders to disclose the total amount of money moving in and out of an account. These figures would have to be broken down according to whether the transaction involved a foreign entity and whether the same account holder controlled both the source account and the recipient. Any account with more than $600 of transactions would be subject to the reporting requirements proposed in May.

In response to widespread concern about the initial proposal, the Biden administration and the Treasury Department have now made changes to the proposal that would constitute a substantial step down from what was initially proposed in May. In the new proposal, the trigger for IRS reporting would come when more than $10,000 in transfers occur on a single account over the course of one year. The proposed $10,000 threshold would not take into account deposits of salary or wages. Banks would be able to round their reported figures to the nearest $1,000.

Banks are naturally bent on opposing this action. The American Bankers Association (ABA) has indicated that they will oppose any such measure, regardless of the recent changes, so long as the plan implements additional reporting requirements.

How Does the New IRS Reporting Initiative Affect Bank Accounts in the U.S.?

Contained within the proposal are critical details that could impact how banks function going forward if passed. While the proposal does not include any additional taxes or tax increases, these additional measures may impact the way your bank handles your account.

Banks are already responsible for reporting interest income. The form that is used for this purpose, Form 1099-INT, would get a little bit longer. However, the government claims that spending data will not be collected through this form and that the requirement is limited to the sum of money that flows in and out of the account.

While the administration insists that the measure is intended to target upper-class tax evaders with opaque income streams from sources other than salary, opponents of the measure are wary of its impact on other taxpayers. Legislators on the opposite side of the aisle warn that the new reporting guidelines could be used to catch working-class taxpayers on honest mistakes. This would fit the pattern of previous behavior from the IRS, which actually targets lower-earning American taxpayers for audits at higher rates than higher-earning individuals.

With the prospect of this proposal becoming law in the future, banks face the difficult task of increasing oversight and generating more complex filings with the government. Satisfying these requirements will cost time and money. It should be expected that these costs will likely be passed on to the account holder. If the new plan is passed, you would be reasonable to expect to see bank fees hike to compensate for the extra legwork.

Supreme Court Confirms IRS Can Secretly Obtain Bank Records

While many taxpayers already suspect that the IRS has the power to access bank information, a recent Supreme Court decision in Polselli v. IRS puts those concerns on firmer ground. The unanimous ruling affirms that under certain circumstances, the IRS can issue summonses to financial institutions without notifying the affected account holders—even if those holders are relatives or associates of a taxpayer who owes the IRS money and they themselves do not owe any tax debt.

Background of Polselli v. IRS

• Facts: A taxpayer, Remo Polselli, owed more than $2 million to the IRS. The agency issued summonses to banks holding accounts in the name of Polselli’s wife and his law firm without notifying them.
• Legal Question: Can the IRS skip notifying third parties whose accounts might be probed during tax collection efforts (as opposed to tax determination or investigation)?
• Ruling: The Supreme Court held that notice is not required if the IRS summons is issued “in aid of the collection” of an assessed or adjudicated tax debt. The plain language of the relevant statute, 26 U.S.C. § 7609(c)(2)(D), does not limit this lack of notice to accounts legally controlled by the taxpayer alone.

Impact of the Decision

The ruling clarifies that if you owe back taxes, the IRS can legally investigate the bank records of third parties—including family members or business partners—without providing them prior notice. Critics argue this opens the door for more invasive IRS tactics. However, the Court emphasized it was interpreting straightforward statutory language rather than making policy choices. If you owe the IRS, the agency can and may use its summons power to locate assets and enforce collection—even if those assets are not in your own name.

“Collection” Versus “Investigation”

Under Polselli v. IRS, the Supreme Court reiterated that collection of a known tax liability (when the IRS has already assessed a debt) differs from investigation or determination of whether taxes are owed in the first place. For the latter, the IRS typically must notify the parties named in the summons. For the former (collection), the IRS can bypass the notice requirement if the records sought could aid in recovering overdue taxes.

Can the IRS Take Money from Your Bank Account Without Notice?

Although the IRS can obtain your bank records without notice under certain circumstances, levying funds directly from your bank account follows a different set of rules. Generally, the IRS cannot seize the money in your account without sending prior notices and giving you an opportunity to resolve the issue. Below is an overview of how the levy process works and what you can do to protect your assets.

The IRS Collections Process

1. Initial Billing and Notices

   The IRS begins by sending a bill for unpaid taxes, along with a notice explaining your options. If you fail to respond or make arrangements, you may receive additional notices or phone calls, and eventually, you could see a federal tax lien filed against your property.

2. Notice of Intent to Levy

   Once a lien is in place and you have not addressed your tax liabilities, the IRS will send a CP405, Notice of Intent to Levy, alerting you that seizure of property or funds may occur if the debt remains unresolved.

3. Final Notice (Letter 1058)

   At least 30 days before taking funds, the IRS typically issues a Final Notice of Intent to Levy (Letter 1058). This is your last chance to pay the overdue balance, negotiate a payment plan, or request a Collection Due Process (CDP) hearing.

4. Levy Execution

   If you ignore the final notice, the IRS can serve a levy on your bank. Your bank is then required to hold the specified funds for 21 days before remitting them to the IRS. This window gives you a brief final opportunity to resolve the situation (for instance, by paying the debt or negotiating an installment agreement).

Wage Garnishments

In addition to levying your bank account, the IRS can garnish wages to satisfy unpaid taxes. An employer must withhold part of an employee’s paycheck and send it directly to the IRS. This is simpler for a typical W-2 employee—but for business owners paying themselves out of an S-corporation or LLC, it can become more complicated because you effectively must garnish your own wages. Failing to comply can lead to even more severe enforcement actions.

Options to Stop (or Prevent) a Levy

1. Full Payment

   Paying your tax debt in full before levy action begins is the most straightforward solution.

2. Installment Agreement

   Set up a monthly payment plan with the IRS (Form 9465) to stop further collection action.

3. Collection Due Process (CDP) Hearing

   If you receive a Final Notice of Intent to Levy, you have 30 days to request a CDP hearing using Form 12153. At the hearing, you may contest the amount owed or propose alternative arrangements such as an Offer in Compromise or an installment plan.

4. Appeals via the Collection Appeals Program (CAP)

   If you believe the IRS took (or is about to take) funds from your account without appropriate notice, you can request a CAP hearing by filing Form 9423. Be mindful of short deadlines; for instance, you generally have only three business days after talking to an IRS collection manager to postmark your appeal.

What If the IRS Already Took Funds Without Notice?

If you honestly did not receive the required notices:

• Verify Missing Notices: Check if the IRS mailed notices to an old or incorrect address.
• Contact the IRS: Ask for a levy reversal, explaining you were never properly notified.
• Consider an Appeal: If direct communication fails, you can file for a Collection Appeals Program hearing. Acting quickly is crucial, as deadlines can be very short.

What Can You Do to Prevent Possible IRS Audits?

If the IRS is granted access to this new data directly from banks, the doors on potential civil, eggshell and reverse eggshell audits and criminal tax investigations will likely swing wide open, leaving tens of thousands of taxpayers exposed in a way they had not been before. If you are concerned about the prospect of a high-risk civil tax audit or far worse IRS-CID criminal tax investigation in light of these new developments in Washington, it would be wise  proactively to protect your net worth and your very liberty.

One way in which you can defend yourself against a high-risk tax audit or criminal tax probe is through voluntary disclosure. Many U.S. taxpayers avail themselves of the government’s voluntary disclosure program every year. Essentially, the IRS is more likely to look favorably upon taxpayers who come forward voluntarily with additional information that modifies inconsistencies in past filings. By incurring this favor, disclosing taxpayers will ordinarily see their possible civil fines reduced and criminal exposure eliminated entirely.

Voluntary disclosure is a delicate process. If the government is already aware of the tax impropriety to be disclosed, the disclosure may hurt the taxpayer more than it helps. Never attempt to voluntarily disclose additional financial information to the government without first speaking to one of the dual-licensed Tax Attorneys and CPAs at the Tax Law Offices of David W. Klasing. Whether you are already facing an audit or are concerned about an IRS criminal tax investigation’s special agent showing up at your door in the future, we urge you to reach out to us today for help.

As uniquely qualified and extensively experienced Criminal Tax Defense Tax Attorneys, KovelCPAs and EAs, our firm provides a one stop shop to efficiently achieve the optimal and predictable results that simultaneously protect your liberty and your net worth. See our Testimonials to see what our clients have to say about us!

Bottom Line: Managing IRS Debts and Avoiding Summonses

The Polselli ruling illustrates how aggressively the IRS can pursue overdue tax debts. If you owe taxes, it is wise to work out a payment plan or installment agreement before enforcement escalates to forced collection activities or summonses. The IRS offers several options, including short-term (up to 120 days) or long-term (monthly) payment plans, based on how much you owe. Businesses owing under $25,000 in certain circumstances can stretch payments over 24 months or more.

Proactive compliance—including prompt filing of delinquent returns and disclosure of any undisclosed income—can help you avoid forced collections and potential intrusion into your bank records (or into the accounts of your associates and relatives). If you cannot pay in full, it is generally best to contact the IRS to arrange an installment agreement rather than ignore the problem and risk a full-blown enforcement action.

Want to Learn More About the Impact of IRS Access to Your Bank Account? Call Us Today

From expanded bank reporting proposals to the Supreme Court’s affirmation of secret IRS summonses in Polselli, the federal government’s powers to identify and collect unpaid taxes are increasing. Protecting your financial privacy and avoiding severe enforcement measures means taking proactive steps—whether that involves voluntary disclosure, negotiating a payment plan, or seeking professional legal and tax advice. If you have failed to file a tax return for one or more years or have taken a position on a tax return that could not be supported upon an IRS or state tax authority audit, eggshell audit, reverse eggshell audit, or criminal tax investigation, it is in your best interest to contact an experienced tax defense attorney to determine your best route back into federal or state tax compliance without facing criminal prosecution.

At the Tax Law Offices of David W. Klasing, our dual-certified tax lawyers and CPAs stay current on developments in tax legislation so that our clients remain protected. Working with our experienced dual-licensed Tax Attorneys & CPAs can provide the guidance and peace of mind you need as you navigate the challenges of coming back into compliance with the U.S. Tax Code. Working with a tax attorney can help you better understand the risks you face and your potential pathways to mitigate the consequences and penalties you face. Call our offices at (888) 904-4096 to schedule your first reduced-rate initial appointment here.

Here is a link to our YouTube channel: click here!

See our Audit Representation Q and A Library

See our Criminal Tax Law Q and A Library

See our Tax Relief and Resolution Q and A Library

See our Offer in Compromise Q and A Library

See our Liens Levys and Garnishments Q and A Library

Public Contact: Dave Klasing Esq. M.S.-Tax CPA, dave@taxesqcpa.net

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/from-the-tax-law-offices-of-david-w-klasing—does-the-irs-have-potentially-non-disclosed-access-to-your-banking-transaction-history-302381136.html

SOURCE Tax Law Offices of David W. Klasing, PC